Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KENDRICK, A.
Right arrow Articles by MAPSTONE, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

The Functions of Child Care Reviews in Scotland A Preliminary Investigation

ANDREW KENDRICK and ELISABETH MAPSTONE

Andrew J. Kendrick is a Research Fellow at the Social Work Research Unit, Department of Political Science and Social Policy, Dundee University. He has a Ph.D. in Social Anthropology from the London School of Economics (1984) and he previously worked on an evaluation of Urban Aid funded community projects for Central Regional Council. His present research is a study of reviews of children in care in Scotland.

Elisabeth Mapstone is professor in Social Administration and Social Work, Department of Political Science and Social Policy, Dundee University. She has held numerous practice and research posts in child care and her previous research includes a study of assessment of children in care.

Correspondence to Dr A. J. Kendrick, Research Fellow, Department of Political Science and Social Policy, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland.

Summary

In this second article based upon the first stage of a research project on statutory child care reviews in Scotland we explore the perceptions of the functions of reviews. We identify a number of primary functions which can be viewed together as elements in a rational model of decision-making. With certain provisos this model allows us to distinguish analytically the explicit purpose of child care reviews. We show that although a number of other functions take place in reviews these are not perceived as necessary to reviews and as such can be considered secondary functions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
B. J. Taylor
Factorial Surveys: Using Vignettes to Study Professional Judgement
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2006; 36(7): 1187 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.