Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, D.
Right arrow Articles by BLAGG, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

The Cumbrian Reparation Scheme

DAVID SMITH and HARRY BLAGG

David Smith worked as a probation officer for several years before moving in 1976 to Lancaster University where he lectures in social work.

Harry Blagg is lecturer in social policy at Lancaster University. His research interests have shifted in recent years from Soviet social policy to current issues of crime and criminal justice.

Correspondence to David Smith, Lecturer in Social Work, Department of Social Administration, University of Lancaster, Fylde College, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YF

Summary

This paper discusses an experimental ‘reparation’ scheme run by the probation service in Cumbria. A general context is provided by an analysis of some varieties of mediation and reparation, and the scheme is then placed within its local organizational context, which meant that it drew its work from juvenile liaison panels established by the police. The paper argues that the panels suffered from the lack of a clear commitment to diversion from prosecution on the part of the police, and that the reparation scheme was used as part of the probation service's effort to increase the use of cautions. The practice of reparation and the experiences victims and offenders had of it are then reviewed. Offenders generally viewed the scheme more positively than victims, but some victims were glad of the opportunity to be involved in something which might be helpful to young offenders. In conclusion, it is argued that despite the contradictions which were evident in the practice of reparation in this setting, there may still be scope for innovative work by social work agencies in relation to victims of crime.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.