© British Association of Social Workers
Feminism and Social work: Resistance or Dialogue?
Annie Hudson is a Lecturer in Social Work in the Department of Social Administration at the University of Manchester. After qualifying in social work at Sussex University, she worked as a social worker in a local authority area team and then at Newcastle upon Tyne Family Service Unit. Before taking up her current post, she was a Lecturer in Social Work at Sunderland Polytechnic.
Summary
This paper seeks to explore some of the factors underpinning social work's apparent resistance to feminism and to dilineate ways in which a more active relationship might benefit social work's women consumers. It argues that, by marginalizing feminism, social work has perpetuated individualistic explanations and responses to women's specific needs and problems. Finally, in suggesting some practical strategies for making use of feminist ideas and experiences, particular consideration is given to some of the contradictions which may be engendered for those social workers who are actively endeavouring to integrate feminist perspectives into their practice.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Averett The Search for Wonder Woman: An Autoethnography of Feminist Identity Affilia, November 1, 2009; 24(4): 360 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Orme `It's Feminist because I Say So!': Feminism, Social Work and Critical Practice in the UK Qualitative Social Work, June 1, 2003; 2(2): 131 - 153. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Krane Feminist Thinking as an Aid to Teaching Social Work Research Affilia, December 1, 1991; 6(4): 53 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ward and A. Mullender Empowerment and oppression: An indissoluble pairing for contemporary social work Critical Social Policy, September 1, 1991; 11(32): 21 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Le Riche and C. Rowlings Feminist group work with older women: emerging issues and future possibilities International Social Work, April 1, 1990; 33(2): 121 - 136. [PDF] |
||||



