Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOEWENBERG, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

Professional Ideology, Middle Range Theories and Knowledge Building for Social Work Practice

FRANK M. LOEWENBERG

Frank M. Loewenberg studied at Harvard (History and Literature), Columbia (Social Work) and received a doctorate from Wayne State University (Sociology and Social Work). He emigrated to Israel 13 years ago and is currently a professor of Social Work at the School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel. He is the author of many books and articles, including Fundamentals of Social Intervention and Ethical Decisions for Social Work Practice (with Ralph Dolgoff).

Please address requests for reprints to Professor F. M. Loewenberg, School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, 52100 Ramat Gan, Israel.

Summary

More effective social work practice will require increased efforts toward knowledge building and theory development. Until a unified social work theory is available social workers will choose eclectically relevant theoretical formulations from the large number of middle range theories available to them from other professional disciplines. New middle range theories and innovative theoretical formulations appear continually, resulting in a smorgasbord of theories, from which social work practitioners can choose. This article examines the effectiveness of an aclectic theory base for a practice profession. In the discussion of the findings note is taken of the need for explicating social work's professional ideology as a next step in knowledge building.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social WorkHome page
J. Osmond
Knowledge Use in Social Work Practice: Examining its Functional Possibilities
Journal of Social Work, December 1, 2006; 6(3): 221 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
K. L. Chan and C. L.W. Chan
Social workers' conceptions of the relationship between theory and practice in an organizational context
International Social Work, October 1, 2004; 47(4): 543 - 557.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
A. A. Abbott
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Professional Opinion Scale: A Values Assessment Instrument
Research on Social Work Practice, September 1, 2003; 13(5): 641 - 666.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.